manuscript under consideration nature communications

For authors who opt-in, the posting will happen when our editors decide whether to send the manuscript for external review. This statement will be published at the end of all papers, whether or not a competing interest is reported. Is it a normal process if all results by the "Track Change" function in MS-Word of my revised manuscript, are visible after being built in Elsevier? Titles of cited articles are required for Articles, Letters, Reviews and Progress articles. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . Sources for kits should be identified. Approved human gene symbols are provided by HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC), e-mail:hgnc@genenames.org; see alsowww.genenames.org. Authors are asked to provide the names and contact information for qualified scientific reviewers and they may request the exclusion of certain referees. Authors should provide a cover letter that includes the affiliation and contact information for the corresponding author. Decoding your manuscript's status in Editorial Manager (major revision)6 (revision)3 (Covid-19) 3. In addition, reviewers can access the manuscript online, which speeds up the review process. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. John H Elliott - Empires Of The Atlantic World.pdf nature17under consideration - BibTeX bibliography files cannot be accepted. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average time that a manuscript moves through the submission process from submission to first decision takes about 30 days, and to a final decision about 54 days, but this is dependent upon many factors and is different for each journal. All textual content should be provided in a single file, prepared using either Microsoft Word or TeX/LaTeX; figures should be provided in individual files. In any case, there's nothing to do except wait and see. If you dont have one, you can create one at this stage. I wonder if this is a usual case. Authors of accepted papers are encouraged to submit images for consideration as an image of the week. Why higher the binding energy per nucleon, more stable the nucleus is.? Tips. Note that editors do not ensure that the paper is properly anonymised; that is the authors' responsibility. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. It appears that your manuscript might have passed the initial screening for basic requirements by the handling editor. If the manuscript is sent to reviewers, the preprint on Research Square will be displayed as being under review at Nature Research for as long as the manuscript is being considered. Thence arose the classic fable of the peasant, who, as he slept, was bitten by a fly. As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. Footnotes are not used. volume11, Articlenumber:2959 (2020) What does the typical workflow of a journal look like? A fast and accurate SNP detection algorithm for next-generation sequencing data. Scale bars should be used rather than magnification factors, with the length of the bar defined in the legend rather than on the bar itself. Depending on the range of statuses the journal uses, this status might even mean that some reviews have been received. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. When the preprint is posted, a HTML version of the manuscript will be created and displayed when original figures are available, making it more machine-readableand hence easier to be discovered by search enginesthan a PDF. Learn more . More information about In Review for Nature Research journals, including the minimum disclosures required, can be found here. Acknowledgements should be briefand should not include effusive comments. NAT COMMUN. As noted in our January Editorial 5, AI tools cannot . Please submit tables at the end of your text document (in Word or TeX/LaTeX, as appropriate). We have been offering this option to our authors for two and a half years, and we are very happy to report that 59% of the authors who opted in ended up depositing a preprint of their work as a result of our initiative. At the same time, do write a polite follow-up email to the journal requesting the current status of the manuscript. Example: Eigler, D. M. & Schweizer, E. K. Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope. //-->Editorial process | Nature Communications When a manuscript is accepted for publication, we will ask for high-resolution figure files, possibly in a different electronic format. (major revision)6 (revision)3(Covid-19), 3. Commercial suppliers of reagents or instrumentation should be identified only when the source is critical to the outcome of the experiments. Is it possible to create a concave light? Stereo diagrams should be presented for divergent 'wall-eyed' viewing, with the two panels separated by ~5.5 cm. 2017-07-13 11:21. The link from our page to the preprint is available for the length of the peer review process, and removed once a final decision is made. Unless it is just rejected by an editor. We discourage deposition of references within the Supplementary Information as they will not be live links and will not contribute towards citation measures for the papers concerned. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Communications (Nat Commun) Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Cookie Notice How to handle a seriously unresponsive journal? Supplementary Information should be combined and supplied as a separate file, preferably in Word format. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Also, if it had to be negative outcome, it wouldnt take so long for a publisher like Nature to come up with the decision, so you can relax and hope for a positive outcome. Jun Long LIM, PhD - STAR Ambassador - A*STAR - LinkedIn Trying to understand how to get this basic Fourier Series. Please see theopen access pagefor APC pricing and details of our free funding support service. Research is often a slow process, requiring the careful design, optimization, and replication of experiments. For optimal results, prepare figures to fit the pdf page size (210 x 276 mm), and supply the figure in the format in which they were compiled. General Average and Risk Management in Medieval and Early Modern What molecular features create the sensation of sweetness? Please submit the Supplementary Information as a single Word file, if possible, otherwise a single PDF. ISSN 2041-1723 (online), Human behaviour and social sciences studies, Characterisation of chemical and biomolecular materials, Details of the manuscript transfer service, Listing of all NPG journals and subject areas, A general explanation of the relationships between Nature titles. Standard abbreviations for reagents and solvents are encouraged. The journal editors will take the previous reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases the editors may choose to take advice from additional referees. Authors are asked to provide specific information about their submission. Authors of submitted manuscripts which include the image Lena will be requested to substitute the image, or justify the scientific necessity for using the image, prior to peer review. What happens if a reviewer withdraws himself from peer review process? and our It only takes a minute to sign up. To obtain Thank you for visiting nature.com. Experimental protocols that describe the synthesis of new compounds should be included. Update on the question. //-->In Review | SpringerNature | Authors | Springer Nature Abstract Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. What happen if the reviewer reject, but the editor give major revision? He awoke, and in a rage killed the insect. The 'Manuscript Information' primary task is the second step in the manuscript submission process. Commun. Nature Communications is read by scientists from diverse backgrounds. We strongly recommend that authors ask a colleague with different expertise to review the manuscript before submission, in order to identify concepts and terminology that may present difficulties to non-specialist readers. For specific details, see Formatting an Initial Submission. not revised manuscripts), authors may choose to incorporate the manuscript text and figures into a single file (Microsoft Word, TeX/LaTeX or PDF) up to 30 MB in size the figures may be inserted within the text at the appropriate positions, or grouped at the end. For first submissions (i.e. Just want to clarify, that this question is specific to the editorial process of 'Nature Communications' which is not usual and not related to generalized peer review process. The manuscript text file should include the following parts, in order: a title page with author affiliations and contact information (the corresponding author should be identified with an asterisk); the sections required for each content type (see information for different content types) then References, Acknowledgements (optional), Author Contributions (Articles only), Competing Interests statement, Figure Legends and Tables. This is known as a rescinding. NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, MACMILLAN BUILDING, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, ENGLAND, N1 9XW. What does it mean? Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Nature Communications encouraged rapid dissemination of results with the launch of Under Consideration in 2017. Can I tell police to wait and call a lawyer when served with a search warrant? To obtain Cite this article. As part of our efforts to improve transparency in authorship, we request that all corresponding authors of published papers provide their Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier (ORCID) ID, before resubmitting the final version of the manuscript. Cactus Communications. [CDATA[// >