We also found that manuscripts from female authors or authors from less prestigious institutions are accepted with a lower rate than those from male authors or more prestigious institutions, respectively. Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. Privacy Nature-branded journals publishing primary research introduced DBPR as an optional service in March 2015 in response to authors requests [17]. In future works, we will consider studying the post-decision outcome also in relation to the gender of reviewers and defining a quality metric for manuscripts in order to isolate the effect of bias. Decision Summary. For example, a report showed that 34% of 880 manuscripts submitted to two radiology journals contained information that would either potentially or definitely reveal the identities of the authors or their institution [2]. In the ten countries with the highest number of submissions, we found a large significant association between country and review type (p value <0.001, df=10, Cramers V=0.189). On submission, authors should choose one or two referral journals, in the order of preference, or "no referral." 0000009876 00000 n
Usage: . This might indicate that authors are more likely to choose DBPR when the stakes are higher in an attempt to increase their success chances by removing any implicit bias from the referees. We only retained a normalised institution name and country when the query to the GRID API returned a result with a high confidence, and the flag manual review was set to false, meaning that no manual review was needed. We then analysed the uptake by gender for the entire portfolio, as we were interested in finding any gender-related patterns. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. We found a small but significant association between journal tier and review type. Res Integr Peer Rev 3, 5 (2018). Often commercial sensors do not provide researchers with sufficient raw and open data; therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an open and customizable system to classify cattle behaviors. We used a significance threshold of 0.05. While the metrics presented here are not intended to be a definitive list, we hope that they will prove to be informative. You can see an example in the article above. This choice of categories is arbitrary, e.g. Nature . Sorry we couldn't be helpful. eLife. Answer: From the description of the status change of the submission, it seems the manuscript did not pass the formatting check by the editorial staff and required corrections from the author. Median values and the graphed interval (minimum and maximum values), are indicated. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The motivation behind Nature Communications is to provide authors with more choice; both in terms of where they publish, and what access model they want for their papers.At present NPG does not provide a rapid publishing opportunity for authors with high-quality specialist work within the Nature branded titles. Uses field-specific PhD-qualified editors, editing to quality standards set by Nature Research. More information regarding the approach taken to derive the median citation can be found here. Plast Reconstr Surg. Because of the small size of the data set for accepted papers and of the lack of an independent measure for the quality of the manuscripts, we could not draw firm conclusions on the existence of implicit bias and on the effectiveness of DBPR in reducing or removing it. How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and Similar results were reported for the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [5]. Yes . "This is an extension of the wisdom-of-crowds theory that allows us to relax the assumption that being in big groups is always the best way to make a . If authors choose DBPR, their details (names and affiliations) are removed from the manuscript files, and it is the authors responsibility to ensure their own anonymity throughout the text and beyond (e.g. This result does not change significantly if we focus on the three institution groups we defined (high-, medium-, and low-prestige), thus excluding the fourth group for which no THE rank was found (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=49.405, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.064), which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. To ascertain whether indeed any referee bias is present, we studied the acceptance rate by gender and review type. Posted by May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska This first-of-its-kind option, called In Review, brought to you by our partners at Research Square, makes it easy . (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The 5-year journal Impact Factor, available from 2007 onward, is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year. There is a tiny but significant association between institution group and acceptance, which means that authors from less prestigious institutions tend to be rejected more than authors from more prestigious institutions, regardless of review type. This may occur as a consequence of positive referee bias towards institution groups or to quality factors. . Sodexo Disney Springs, Here, we define the corresponding author as the author who is responsible for managing the submission process on the manuscript tracking system and for all correspondence with the editorial office prior to publication. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z. [No author listed] Nature journals offer double-blind review. Which proportions of papers are accepted for publication under SBPR and DBPR? PDF Brief Communications and Communications Arising - Ju Li This is a statistically significant result, with a small effect size; the results of Pearsons chi-square test of independence are as follows: 2=1533.9, df=2, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.147. 2008;23(7):3513. We found that 10 countries contributed to 80% of all submissions, and thus, we grouped all other countries under the category Others. From inspection of Table8, it would seem that SBPR manuscripts by female corresponding authors are more likely to be rejected at the first editorial decision stage than those by male corresponding authors and that DBPR manuscripts by male corresponding authors are less likely to be sent to review than those by female corresponding authors. . Table2 displays the uptake by journal group and shows that the review model distribution changes as a function of the journal tier, with the proportion of double-blind papers decreasing for tiers with comparatively higher perceived prestige. 0000005880 00000 n
Editors are always aware of the identity of the authors. trailer
<<
/Size 54
/Info 7 0 R
/Root 10 0 R
/Prev 92957
/ID[<98e42fa76505e1b5b1796b170b58dfee><8c8134bb7fa785eceed4533362dfb985>]
>>
startxref
0
%%EOF
10 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 6 0 R
/Metadata 8 0 R
/PageLabels 5 0 R
>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<< /S 48 /L 155 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 53 0 R >>
stream
For some journals, the status may include the decision term e.g. The Publications Ethics Committee is composed of a chair and two members appointed by the RSNA Board. This is because online submission has completely abolished the uncertainty of postal speed, an obstacle faced when manually submitting a manuscript. Authors must sign into CTS with the email address to which the link was sent. MOYcs@9Y/b6olCfEa22>*OnAhFfu J 1m,&A mc2ya5a'3jyoJx6Fr?pW6'%c?,J;Gu"BB`Uc!``!,>. wuI-\Z&fy R-7. A list of links to the Manuscript Tracking System login pages for each journal is available on the Nature Portfolio Journals A-Z webpage. Scand J Econ. Vintage Cardboard Christmas Decorations, 1 Answer to this question. In the case of transfers, the author cannot change the review type compared to the original submission, and therefore, we excluded the 22,081 (17%) transferred manuscripts from the analysis of author uptake. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the paper - another week. I am not a robot. 2015;136(6):136977. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. Examines all aspects of your scientific document. The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. 0000001568 00000 n
Research Integrity and Peer Review Finally, we investigated the outcome of post-review decisions as a function of peer review model and characteristics of the corresponding author. Bruce R, Chauvin A, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, Boutron I. Regarding institutional bias, a report of a controlled experiment found that SBPR reviewers are more likely than DBPR reviewers to accept manuscripts from famous authors and high-ranked institutions [15], while another report found that authors at top-ranked universities are unaffected by different reviewing methods [16]. 2009;4(1):624. . Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. In the SBPR case, we cannot reject the null hypothesis. Did you find it helpful? Similar results are achieved if simpler logistic regression models are considered, such as review type modelled on journal tier and institution and review type modelled on journal tier only. Submission has been transferred to another journal, see How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? We have used this definition because it is in line with that used in the guide to authors for Nature (https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/initial-submission).
Greenpeace Malaysia Scammer,
Va Finger Disability Percentage,
Rockcastle County Property Valuation Administrator,
Section 8 Houses For Rent Metairie, La,
Fine For Expired Inspection Sticker Ma,
Articles D
